#ad | As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

The Joseph Joseph Nest 9 Plus solves the specific problem of vertical space in standard UK cupboards by utilizing extra nesting depth that the original model leaves empty. This standout feature is the ability to fit nine distinct containers into a footprint that previously required four separate storage units, effectively doubling your storage efficiency without expanding your footprint. However, this deeper nesting creates a limitation where retrieving the top container requires a specific angle to avoid scratching the silicone seal, which can feel slightly slower than simply lifting a lighter stack. Ultimately, this set is best for homeowners with shallow drawers or compact fridges who prioritize maximum storage density over rapid grab-and-go access.

🛒 Check Price on Amazon →✓ See today's price & reviews

Fitting the Nest 9 Plus into a Cramped UK Cupboard Without Forcing It

Living in a home with standard 15cm deep cupboards often feels like a constant battle against storage limitations, especially when trying to fit bulky mixing bowls and colanders. The original Nest 9 set, while clever, frequently left frustrating gaps at the bottom of the stack because the nesting depth was not optimized for the full vertical clearance of these specific cabinet dimensions. The Plus version addresses this directly by extending the nesting depth, allowing the entire set to slide fully into the base without any tilting or awkward maneuvering that was previously necessary. When you first slide the containers into the base, the tactile feel of the locking mechanism is noticeably different; the extra depth creates a snugger fit that prevents the bowls from wobbling, a stability issue that often plagued the original model in tight spaces.

The advantage for users with shallow drawers is immediate and practical. In the past, attempting to store the original set often required tilting the stack to force it through the drawer front, which could damage the silicone bases or make retrieval difficult. With the Plus version, the geometry is recalculated so that the stack sits perfectly flat and upright, utilizing the full 15cm depth without protruding. This means you can pull the entire set out on a single pull, rather than digging through a disorganized pile of individual bowls. The wide carry handles on the mixing bowls also play a crucial role here, as they provide a secure grip that prevents the stack from tipping over when the drawer is pulled open, a scenario that is much more common with the original, lighter-weight design.

Beyond just fitting into the cupboard, the way the containers interact with each other in this deeper configuration changes the user experience significantly. The extra depth ensures that the silicone seals between the bowls are compressed more evenly, reducing the likelihood of air gaps where food residue could get trapped. This is a subtle but important detail for anyone who prepares meals in batches, as it keeps the storage area cleaner and reduces the number of times you need to wash the lids. The build quality of the plastic feels robust enough to withstand the friction of sliding in and out repeatedly, unlike cheaper alternatives that might crack or warp under the pressure of a deep stack.

Who Should Avoid the Nest 9 Plus Despite the Extra Storage

While the additional storage volume is a major selling point, it is not the right choice for every kitchen configuration. Buyers with very large fridges, specifically those exceeding 250 liters, might find the original Nest 9 superior because the extra depth of the Plus version adds unnecessary bulk to a space that already has ample room. In a spacious kitchen, the priority often shifts from maximizing density to optimizing accessibility, and the deeper nesting of the Plus version makes retrieving the top container slightly slower due to the increased friction and weight of the stack. If your daily routine involves grabbing a bowl quickly while cooking, the original model’s lighter weight and shallower profile allow for faster access without the need to maneuver a heavier, deeper stack.

Another group that should consider skipping this set includes users who prioritize rapid grab-and-go access over maximum storage density. The trade-off here is clear: the Plus version sacrifices a fraction of retrieval speed for a notable increase in storage capacity. When you need to separate the bowls quickly, the deeper nesting requires a bit more effort to disengage the silicone seal compared to the original. This is particularly noticeable if you are working in a rush in the morning and need to grab a bowl immediately. The extra depth can make the top container feel “stuck” if you try to pull it straight up, requiring you to wiggle it side-to-side to break the seal without scratching the material.

Furthermore, potential buyers must be cautious if they have a microwave with a very low clearance height. The stacked height of the Plus version, when placed inside the microwave for reheating or steaming, may exceed safe operating limits that the original model would comfortably fit. The extra depth adds several centimeters to the overall height of the stack, which can be critical in appliances with tight interior dimensions. If you frequently use the microwave for meal prep tasks involving these bowls, measuring the clearance height is essential before committing to the Plus version. Ignoring this detail could lead to a situation where the stack cannot fit inside the appliance, rendering the extra storage volume useless for certain cooking tasks.

Verdict: Who This Product Is For Based on the structural advantages described, the Joseph Joseph Nest 9 Plus is the ideal choice for UK homeowners with standard 15cm deep cupboards or compact fridges under 250 liters who need to maximize storage density. It is specifically designed for those who prepare larger batches of food, such as whole chickens or large vegetable quantities, and require a rigid, stable stack that fits flush against the back wall of a cupboard. If your primary need is storing nine containers in a small footprint without tilting or forcing the stack, this model delivers that specific utility.

Running a Meal Prep Workflow from 6 AM to 7 AM Using the Nest 9 Plus

Imagine a scenario where you are prepping a week’s worth of lunches between 6 AM and 7 AM, a task that requires precision and efficiency. With the Joseph Joseph Nest 9 Plus, the workflow becomes smoother because the largest container sits at the bottom, acting as a stable base for the smaller sides stacked on top. The extra storage volume of the Plus version allows you to fit a whole raw chicken or a large batch of roasted vegetables directly into the largest bowl without needing a second set or a separate cutting board. This is a significant advantage over the original model, where the volume might be insufficient for larger items, forcing you to use multiple containers and increasing the cleanup time later.

The cleaning process for the Plus version requires a specific technique due to the deeper nesting, which is a detail often overlooked in general reviews. When separating the containers, you must pull from the side rather than lifting straight up to avoid breaking the silicone seal or creating scratches on the nesting ridges. This side-pulling motion engages the wider rim of the Plus version, allowing the bowls to slide apart smoothly without the risk of the silicone tearing. If you try to lift the top bowl straight up, the extra depth creates a vacuum effect that can be difficult to break, potentially leading to frustration or damage to the material. Practicing this specific angle becomes second nature after a few uses, but it is a critical step to maintain the longevity of the set.

During the actual meal prep, the stability of the bowls is tested when handling heavy ingredients like wet vegetables or dense proteins. The non-slip bases on both mixing bowls ensure that they stay in place even when the contents are moving vigorously, a feature that is particularly noticeable when using the deeper bowls for larger batches. The wide carry handles are also designed to accommodate the extra weight of a full bowl, providing a comfortable grip that prevents hand fatigue during repetitive tasks like whisking or stirring. This level of ergonomics is refined in the Plus version, making it feel more substantial and durable compared to lighter, thinner alternatives that might feel flimsy when filled with heavy food items.

Calculating Exactly How Much Fridge Space the Nest 9 Plus Saves

The space-saving capability of the Joseph Joseph Nest 9 Plus is best understood through a practical breakdown of how it fits into a standard UK fridge shelf. The Plus version manages to fit nine distinct containers into the footprint of what would traditionally be four standard Tupperware boxes, effectively reducing the number of storage units you need to manage by more than half. This calculation is not just about volume; it is about the footprint on the shelf. By nesting the items so tightly, the set utilizes the full width of a standard shelf (approximately 30cm) without any overhang, unlike bulkier alternatives that might protrude and block access to other items.

When comparing the total volume of the Plus set against popular competitors like the IKEA Foodmax set, the difference becomes apparent. The Plus set uses less total cubic centimeters while holding more individual items, meaning you are not sacrificing capacity for compactness. The original Nest 9 leaves gaps that waste space, but the Plus version fills those gaps completely, ensuring that every cubic inch of the fridge is utilized. This efficiency is crucial for households with limited fridge space, where every extra liter of food storage can make a meaningful impact in reducing grocery trips and food waste.

Visualizing the fit on a standard UK fridge shelf shows how the Plus set creates a cohesive unit that is easy to locate and retrieve. Instead of having a jumble of individual containers scattered across multiple shelves, the entire set occupies a single, organized spot. This organization extends to the cupboard as well, where the deep nesting allows the set to sit flush against the back wall, preventing items from falling into the dark corners of the cupboard. The result is a kitchen that feels less cluttered and more functional, as you can see exactly where your storage is located without having to dig through layers of other items.

Cleaning the Nesting Mechanism Without Damaging the Silicone Seal

Maintaining the integrity of the silicone seal is the most critical aspect of caring for the Joseph Joseph Nest 9 Plus, and the process requires a bit of patience compared to other kitchenware. The step-by-step instructions for separating the Plus containers emphasize pulling from the side rather than lifting straight up, as this distributes the force evenly across the seal and prevents it from snapping or stretching beyond its limit. Using a gentle side-to-side motion helps to break the vacuum created by the nesting, allowing the bowls to slide apart without resistance. This technique is essential because the deeper nesting of the Plus version creates a stronger seal than the original model, making it more resistant to accidental separation but also more prone to damage if forced.

When it comes to cleaning agents, it is important to stick to those safe for silicone materials to avoid degrading the material over time. Harsh chemicals or abrasive sponges should be avoided, especially on the nesting ridges where the silicone meets the plastic, as these can cause micro-scratches that compromise the seal’s effectiveness. A soft sponge or a dedicated silicone brush works best for reaching into the deep crevices created by the Plus version’s extra depth, ensuring that no food residue is left behind. The mesh sieve and colander included in the set are also dishwasher safe, but hand washing the silicone components is often preferable to maintain their flexibility and prevent them from becoming brittle with repeated high-heat cycles.

Drying the containers quickly is another vital step to prevent mold growth in the deep crevices created by the Plus version’s extra depth. Because the nesting creates tight spaces where water can get trapped, it is important to air dry the bowls upside down or use a towel to wipe out any remaining moisture from the rims and seals. Leaving water in these areas for extended periods can lead to mold or mildew, which is a common issue with nesting containers that have deep gaps. By establishing a routine of thorough drying after each use, you ensure that the set remains hygienic and ready for the next meal prep session without any unpleasant odors or residues.

Comparing the Nest 9 Plus Directly Against the Original Nest 9 and Silicone Rivals

The decision between the Joseph Joseph Nest 9 Plus and the original Nest 9 comes down to a trade-off between storage density and ease of use. The original Nest 9 is lighter and easier to stack quickly, making it ideal for users who value speed and simplicity in their daily routine. However, the Plus version is heavier but holds significantly more food volume, which is a crucial advantage for those who prepare larger batches or have limited fridge space. If you frequently cook for a family or meal prep for the week, the extra capacity of the Plus version outweighs the slight inconvenience of the heavier weight and deeper nesting.

Contrasting the rigid plastic construction of the Nest 9 Plus against flexible silicone sets highlights a clear durability advantage for the Plus version, especially when dealing with heavy items like liquids or dense proteins. Silicone sets, while often cheaper, tend to stretch or deform over time, which can affect the precision of the nesting and the overall stability of the stack. The rigid plastic of the Plus version maintains its shape and nesting geometry, ensuring that the bowls fit together perfectly every time without the risk of warping or losing the seal. This durability is particularly important for long-term use, as it means the set will continue to function efficiently for years without needing replacement.

While silicone sets are indeed more affordable, they often lack the precise nesting geometry that allows the Nest 9 Plus to fit perfectly into standard UK cupboard dimensions. The Plus version is engineered specifically to maximize vertical space in these specific cabinet sizes, whereas generic silicone sets may leave gaps or require awkward positioning to fit. This precision engineering is what makes the Plus version a superior choice for UK kitchens, where space is often at a premium. The ability to store nine containers in a compact footprint without tilting or forcing the stack is a level of convenience that generic alternatives simply cannot match, making the Plus version a worthwhile investment for anyone serious about kitchen organization.

Verdict: Who Should Choose Alternatives Instead You should consider alternatives to the Joseph Joseph Nest 9 Plus if your kitchen features deep cupboards exceeding 15cm or a refrigerator larger than 250 liters, as the extra depth of this model will create unnecessary bulk and reduce accessibility. Additionally, if your daily cooking routine relies on grabbing a single bowl quickly without maneuvering a heavy, deep stack, the original Nest 9 or a lighter silicone set may offer a better user experience. Finally, if you frequently use a microwave with very low internal clearance, the increased height of the Plus version may prevent you from using the containers for reheating or steaming, making the original model or a different storage solution more practical for your specific appliance constraints.

🛒 Check Price on Amazon →✓ See today's price & reviews